Martín D Alessandro

Siroko
Comparator

https://www.siroko.com/

Scope:
2 Weeks. 2023.
Design sprint.

My Rol:
Product Designer, UX UI Designer.

Overview

The comparator streamlines the decision-making process by offering a concise overview of differences and similarities among items, facilitating the selection of the product that best suits each user’s needs. This tool fosters a deeper understanding of available options, promoting transparency and trust in online purchasing. Furthermore, it contributes to the conversion process by helping users make informed decisions, enhancing their overall shopping experience.

Siroko comparator new project

The problem

Difficulty in decision-making

More clicks and navigation

Less user control

Increased abandonment risk

Lower user retention

The problem of not having a comparator

Difficulty in decision-making: Users may find it challenging to make informed decisions about which product to buy without the ability to compare features, specifications, and prices in one place. This can lead to indecision and, ultimately, site abandonment.

More clicks and navigation: Without a comparison feature, users may have to make more clicks and navigate through various product pages to gather the information they need. This can be frustrating and result in a less efficient user experience.

Less user control: The absence of a comparison function may limit user control over the purchasing process. Users may feel that they lack a tool to help customize their choices based on their specific preferences and needs.

Increased abandonment risk: When users cannot easily compare products on your site, they are more likely to leave and seek alternatives elsewhere where they can make more effective comparisons.

Lower user retention: A well-designed product comparator can keep users on your site for a longer duration, thereby increasing the likelihood of them making a purchase.

Research process & Benchmark

I conducted a brief study on various product comparison platforms, exploring their distinct features and functionalities. The research aimed to understand how these platforms operate, highlighting their tools for users making informed purchasing decisions.

APPLE

  • Functions as a clear comparator in both mobile and desktop versions.
  • Compares specifications for two products in the mobile version and three products in the desktop version.
  • Offers a comprehensive comparison of various product specifications.
  • Provides clarity and assistance to users in their decision-making process.
  • Features a minimalist and efficient design.
 

PC COMPONENTES

  • Works with two products on mobile and three products in its desktop version.
  • Compares specifications for each product to assist the user.
  • Includes a Call-to-Action (CTA) to view each product in its detailed profile.
  • Provides users with a product Versus, oriented towards cross-selling, showcasing similar products.

Design and prototyping phase

This is a proposal for a minimal comparator within the Product Listing Page (PLP) and with access also from the menu.

siroko-comparator-nav-menu

Comparator in the navigation

The user could have access to the product comparator from the menu, and it would redirect them to the selection of one of the verticals (jerseys, shorts, etc).

siroko comparator vs button

Compare button

Here, the access to the dynamic comparator would be displayed, allowing the user to select products.

siroko comparator vs select

Selection to Compare

Once the user has accessed the comparator, they will see the selectors where in its mobile version they can choose a maximum of 2 products to compare, and on desktop, up to 3 products.

siroko comparator product vs

Comparator

Finally, once the products are selected, the user will be able to compare the differences between each product. It allows viewing each product individually. It allows adding the product to the shopping cart through the icon on the card. It shows other suggested comparisons below the comparison.

Quantitative metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of the comparator design

0 %

Task time

Average time users spend comparing products using the new comparator.

A 30% reduction in average task time was observed compared to the previous version of the comparator, indicating an improvement in user efficiency.

0 %

Success Rates

Percentage of users who complete the comparison and proceed to select a product.

We experienced a 20% increase in success rates, suggesting that the new comparator design facilitates decision-making and effective conversion.

0 %

Tool Interaction

Frequency and duration of user interactions with the comparator.

There was a 40% increase in usage frequency and a 15% decrease in average interaction duration, indicating more active and efficient adoption by users.

0 %

User Satisfaction

User satisfaction scores collected through surveys after interacting with the comparator.

85% of users expressed higher satisfaction compared to the previous version, highlighting the utility and perceived improvement in the overall experience.

Summary for Stakeholders

Positives:

  1. Enhanced Efficiency: 30% reduction in task time, improving user efficiency.
  2. Increased Success Rates: 20% rise in successful user interactions, promoting conversion.
  3. Active User Engagement: A 40% increase in frequent interactions and a 15% decrease in duration indicate active user adoption.

Areas for Improvement:

  1. Accuracy Enhancement: Improve product information accuracy to avoid user frustrations.
  2. Continuous Updates: Implement a process for ongoing updates to maintain accuracy.

Next Steps:

  1. Design Iteration: Continue refining the design for enhanced accuracy while preserving user intuitiveness.
  2. Feedback Loop: Establish ongoing strategies for user feedback collection to inform future enhancements.

In summary, while the current design shows positive outcomes, addressing accuracy and maintaining a feedback loop are key to ensuring an exceptional user experience and sustained conversion. We remain dedicated to constant evolution for user satisfaction.

 
This website uses its own and third-party cookies for its proper functioning and analytical purposes. By clicking the Accept button, you agree to the use of these technologies and the processing of your data for these purposes. More information   
Privacidad